Songjiang

Source identity and administrative path

The source row behind Songjiang is GeoNames ID 1794035. Its recorded administrative path is Shanghai Municipality → Shanghai → China, and GeoNames classifies the place as a third-order administrative seat.

Songjiang occurs once as a primary city label in this atlas sample; the numeric ID remains the durable source key if names change. The city row itself was updated 2026-03-31; that date belongs to the source record, not to every transport or visitor detail in the real destination.

Population position inside fixed cohorts

Within the fixed 1,206-record atlas, Songjiang ranks 209 by recorded population. Inside the 296 selected China entries it ranks 69; inside the 632 entries in its broad region it ranks 126.

Its 1,973,500 population value is 1.69 times the 1,165,375 median for the country cohort and 1.96 times the 1,008,426 regional median. Songjiang falls between the leading tenth and quarter of this atlas's China population cohort.

Songjiang's recorded value is above the country-cohort median but remains below twice that benchmark. These comparisons describe this selected dataset only; they are not current census rankings or official urban-area boundaries.

Nearest-reference pattern

Songjiang's three nearest other atlas coordinates are Minhang at 16.627 km with 2,716,600 recorded people; Qingpu at 16.872 km with 1,271,424 recorded people; Jinshan at 23.112 km with 822,776 recorded people. The closest-to-farthest distance spread is 6.485 km. Compared with Minhang, Songjiang's recorded population is 0.73 times as large. Against Songjiang, Minhang follows Shanghai Municipality → Shanghai → China in the source. Its point has higher latitude and higher longitude; it belongs to the same selected China cohort, uses the shared Asia/Shanghai identifier, and carries fourth-order administrative seat rather than third-order administrative seat.

Its recorded population is above Songjiang's. Against Songjiang, Qingpu follows Shanghai Municipality → Shanghai → China in the source. Its point has higher latitude and lower longitude; it belongs to the same selected China cohort, uses the shared Asia/Shanghai identifier, and carries the same third-order administrative seat class. Its recorded population is below Songjiang's. Against Songjiang, Jinshan follows Shanghai Municipality → Shanghai → China in the source.

Its point has lower latitude and higher longitude; it belongs to the same selected China cohort, uses the shared Asia/Shanghai identifier, and carries fourth-order administrative seat rather than third-order administrative seat. Its recorded population is below Songjiang's. Its nearest-neighbor distance ranks 231 of 1,206 from shortest to longest in the same snapshot. Songjiang's nearest-coordinate gap falls between the tightest tenth and quarter of the atlas. This pattern can reveal whether other catalog references are geographically close, but it cannot establish whether a border crossing is possible or practical, or whether rail, road, fare, or journey-time connections exist.

Read as one record signature, GeoNames 1794035, the coordinate pair 31.0344 / 121.2233, country rank 69 of 296, and neighbor GeoNames 1800480 at 16.627 km bind Songjiang to a reproducible comparison. That combined key distinguishes the row; it is not a recommendation or evidence of a physical connection.

Coordinate, time-zone and class cohorts

Songjiang's reference point is 31.0344° north and 121.2233° east. The IANA identifier Asia/Shanghai is shared by 291 city rows in this catalog, while the GeoNames class PPLA3 is shared by 60 rows. Songjiang's row carries both second- and first-order administrative labels.

Songjiang's point falls in the middle-latitude coordinate band used by this atlas's row checks. Songjiang's place-class field defines the narrower catalog cohort; its time zone is shared more broadly. GeoNames supplies no elevation for Songjiang, so the profile preserves that missing value instead of guessing terrain.

Together these fields form a reproducible identity check for this page, not a claim about walkability, climate or accessibility.