Antipolo

Source identity and administrative path

The source row behind Antipolo is GeoNames ID 1730501. Its recorded administrative path is Province of Rizal → Calabarzon → Philippines, and GeoNames classifies the place as a second-order administrative seat.

Antipolo occurs once as a primary city label in this atlas sample; the numeric ID remains the durable source key if names change. The city row itself was updated 2025-09-24; that date belongs to the source record, not to every transport or visitor detail in the real destination.

Population position inside fixed cohorts

Within the fixed 1,206-record atlas, Antipolo ranks 603 by recorded population. Inside the 22 selected Philippines entries it ranks 10; inside the 632 entries in its broad region it ranks 351.

Its 913,712 population value is 1.15 times the 797,334 median for the country cohort and 0.91 times the 1,008,426 regional median. Antipolo sits in the second quarter of this atlas's Philippines population cohort.

Antipolo's recorded value stays within one quarter of the country-cohort median used here. These comparisons describe this selected dataset only; they are not current census rankings or official urban-area boundaries.

Nearest-reference pattern

Antipolo's three nearest other atlas coordinates are Pasig City at 7.869 km with 853,050 recorded people; Quezon City at 8.118 km with 3,084,270 recorded people; Taguig at 12.209 km with 1,308,085 recorded people. The closest-to-farthest distance spread is 4.34 km. Compared with Pasig City, Antipolo's recorded population is 1.07 times as large. Against Antipolo, Pasig City follows Eastern Manila District → National Capital Region → Philippines in the source. Its point has lower latitude and lower longitude; it belongs to the same selected Philippines cohort, uses the shared Asia/Manila identifier, and carries the same second-order administrative seat class.

Its recorded population is below Antipolo's. Against Antipolo, Quezon City follows Eastern Manila District → National Capital Region → Philippines in the source. Its point has higher latitude and lower longitude; it belongs to the same selected Philippines cohort, uses the shared Asia/Manila identifier, and carries the same second-order administrative seat class. Its recorded population is above Antipolo's. Against Antipolo, Taguig follows Southern Manila District → National Capital Region → Philippines in the source.

Its point has lower latitude and lower longitude; it belongs to the same selected Philippines cohort, uses the shared Asia/Manila identifier, and carries third-order administrative seat rather than second-order administrative seat. Its recorded population is above Antipolo's. Its nearest-neighbor distance ranks 123 of 1,206 from shortest to longest in the same snapshot. Antipolo's nearest-coordinate gap falls between the tightest tenth and quarter of the atlas. This pattern can reveal whether other catalog references are geographically close, but it cannot establish whether a border crossing is possible or practical, or whether rail, road, fare, or journey-time connections exist.

Read as one record signature, GeoNames 1730501, the coordinate pair 14.6258 / 121.1225, country rank 10 of 22, and neighbor GeoNames 7290466 at 7.869 km bind Antipolo to a reproducible comparison. That combined key distinguishes the row; it is not a recommendation or evidence of a physical connection.

Coordinate, time-zone and class cohorts

Antipolo's reference point is 14.6258° north and 121.1225° east. The IANA identifier Asia/Manila is shared by 22 city rows in this catalog, while the GeoNames class PPLA2 is shared by 341 rows. Antipolo's row carries both second- and first-order administrative labels.

Antipolo's point falls in the near-equatorial coordinate band used by this atlas's row checks. Antipolo's time-zone field defines the narrower catalog cohort; its place class is shared more broadly. GeoNames supplies no elevation for Antipolo, so the profile preserves that missing value instead of guessing terrain.

Together these fields form a reproducible identity check for this page, not a claim about walkability, climate or accessibility.